Zogenix, Inc.
(NASDAQ: ZGNX) is a pharmaceutical company commercializing and developing
products for the treatment of central nervous system disorders and pain. Zogenix’s
lead product candidate, Zohydro (hydrocodone bitartrate, formerly ZX002) is a
12-hour extended-release formulation of hydrocodone without acetaminophen for
the treatment of chronic pain requiring opioid therapy. It has completed its
pivotal phase 3 clinical trials in 2011 and submitted its NDA with PDUFA date
in March 2012. $ZGNX also has approved Sumavel DosePro product which offers
needle-free subcutaneous administration of sumatriptan for the treatment of
migraine and cluster headache in a pre-filled, single-use delivery system. ZGNX
is also developing its second DosePro investigational product candidate,
Relday, which is an injectable formulation of risperidone for the treatment of
schizophrenia.
Zohydro ER
(Hydrocodone bitartrate ER)
Zohydro ER is an oral
agent without acetaminophen and extended-release formulation of various
strengths of hydrocodone dosed every 12 hours for around-the-clock management
of moderate-to-severe chronic pain. Zohydro ER could be the first hydrocodone
product to offer the benefit of less frequent dosing and the ability to treat
chronic pain patients without the risk of liver injury associated with the use
of acetaminophen in high dosages or over long periods of time.
image: suuplements-daily.com |
Chronic pain is
ongoing or recurrent pain that adversely affects an individual's wellbeing. An
estimated 116 million people in the United States are burdened with chronic
pain, at a national economic cost of $560 to $635 billion annually. Currently,
hydrocodone is only available in immediate-release, combination products, most
commonly with the analgesic acetaminophen, and requires dosing every 4 to 6
hours. There is an established need for a single-entity (non-acetaminophen)
hydrocodone medicine to provide people suffering from moderate-to-severe
chronic pain with an effective option to manage their pain without the
significant risk of liver injury associated with the use of acetaminophen in
high dosages or over long periods of time. Research has shown that
approximately 30-35% of hydrocodone combination products are taken on a chronic
basis, for which there is ample evidence that this presents a health risk.
In 2012, there was
a large study that was published by the University of Cincinnati Drug and Poison
Information center that looked at the trends in hepatic injury associated with
unintentional overdose of acetaminophen in products with and without opioids. There were total of 119,731 cases that were identified
in which patient used acetaminophen with opioid containing product. The
incidence of cases increased 70% from year 2000 to 2007. In this study, acetylcycteine treatment was
used to treat hepatic injury caused by acetaminophen. Recommendations for acetylcysteine rose 252%, minor injuries rose 833%,
severe injuries rose 280% and both together rose 500% (all trends p<0.01).
This tells you that the hepatic injury is a serious issue when acetaminophen is
used in excess. In this study, acetaminophen with opioid-related hepatic injuries
rose much faster than acetominophen without opioid-related injuries (500%
versus 134% over year 2000-2007). Injuries rose even though an increasing
percentage of patients are being treated with acetylcysteine.
This study
supports the FDA panel's recommendation to remove acetaminophen from opioid
products but not to remove acetaminophen from non-prescription combination
cough and cold products. While it has always been true that removing
acetominophen from opioid combination products would eliminate these products
as a source of acetominophen-related injury, this study provides additional
motivation, demonstrating that these products represent a significant and
growing portion of those unintentionally injured from overuse of acetaminophen.
As you can see, FDA has a strong support for removal of acetaminophen from the
opioid products. Currently, there are many opioids products that are in the
market and personally I see 30-40% of Rx at the pharmacy being acetaminophen
containing opioid products.
Hydrocodone
is the only opioid not currently available in ER form and available only in
combination with APAP/NSAID; FDA advisory committee noted single entity
formulation of hydrocodone would be logical substitute. FDA has recently asked
manufacturers to limit acetaminophen to 325 mg in combination products and will
require updated labeling information warning about the risk of severe liver
injury
ZGNX completed its
pivotal Phase III trial in October 2011. Below is the summary of the study
design and the results:
Title: Phase 3 Study
of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Controlled-release Capsules in Subjects With Chronic
Low Back Pain
A randomized
Phase 3, placebo-controlled multi-center study to evaluate the safety, efficacy
and tolerability of Hydrocodone Bitartrate controlled-release capsules in
subjects with chronic low back pain. Subjects will go through an open-label
conversion and titration phase followed by a randomized double-blind treatment
phase of HC-CR vs. Placebo. The trial will consist of a Screening Phase (up to
14 days), an open-label Conversion and Titration Phase (up to 6 weeks), a
12-week placebo-controlled Treatment Phase, and a 2-week Follow-Up Phone Call.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects must have a clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe CLBP
- Subjects must be classified as non-neuropathic, neuropathic, or symptomatic for more than 6 months after LBP surgery
- Subjects must in the Investigator's opinion qualify for around-the-clock opioid therapy for treatment of their CLBP.
- Subjects must have been taking opioids for at least 5 days/week for the past 4weeks
- Subjects must have an average Clinic Pain Score of ≥ 4 on the 11-point (0-10) NRS as an average for the last 24 hours of Screening
- Subjects, in the opinion of the Investigator, must be considered to be in generally good health other then CLBP at Screening
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at the Screening Visit, and must consent to use a medically-acceptable method of contraception throughout the entire study period.
- Subjects must voluntarily provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any clinically significant condition that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude study participation or interfere with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of CLBP or increase the risk of opioid-related adverse events
- A medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the subject's ability to swallow, absorb, metabolize, or excrete the study drug
- A surgical procedure for back pain within 6 months
- A nerve or plexus block, including epidural steroid injections or facet blocks
- A history of chemotherapy or confirmed malignancy within past 2 years
- Any other chronic pain condition other than CLBP that, in the Investigator's opinion, would interfere with the assessment of LBP e.g. fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, migraine headaches requiring opioid treatment
- Uncontrolled blood pressure, i.e., subject has a sitting systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or <90 mmHg, and/or a sitting diastolic blood pressure >120 mmHg or <50 mmHg at Screening
- A Body Mass Index (BMI) >45 kg/m2
- A Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Index score of >12 in either depression or anxiety subscales or an established history of major depressive disorder that is poorly controlled with medication
- A clinically significant abnormality in clinical chemistry, hematology or urinalysis
Location: only
United States
Results:
The pivotal phase 3
successfully met its primary efficacy endpoint, demonstrating that Zohydro ER
resulted in significantly (p=0.008) improved chronic pain relief compared to
placebo. The two key secondary endpoints in this study - the proportion of
patients with at least 30% improvement in pain intensity and the improvement of
overall satisfaction of medication - were also met.
Additional study
endpoints were supportive of the efficacy of Zohydro ER compared to placebo.
Overall, the most commonly reported adverse events (≥2%) in the
placebo-controlled pivotal Phase 3 efficacy Study 801 in opioid-experienced
patients were consistent with those typically seen with chronic opioid therapy
and were constipation, nausea, somnolence, fatigue, headache, dizziness, dry
mouth, vomiting and pruritus. Study 802, in which patients received Zohydro ER
for up to 12 months, further investigated Zohydro ER's tolerability and safety
profile and showed that the incidence of adverse events was consistent with
that seen in the pivotal Phase 3 efficacy study.
The PDUFA for
Zohydro is in March 01, 2013 with potential FDA advisory panel meeting
(http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/ucm153468.htm). With these two
strong catalyst, there is a strong possibility of $ZGNX stock to make a run in
anticipation of FDA results and AdCom decision.
Financial Standings
Zogenix currently
has $22M in cash as of 06/30/2012 which excludes the net proceeds of $65.5M
from July 2012 equity offering and $21.2M repayment of term loan debt
obligations to Oxford and Silicon Valley bank. In my opinion, the company has
enough cash position into the PDUFA date. Since they recently completed equity
offering of ~$65M, the possibility of another dilution is very little. Once
again, with the small cap Biotechnology Company there is always a risk of
additional dilution and/or ATM. With
these two strong upcoming catalysts we will see a dramatic appreciation in
stock price as we get near AdCom meeting in December 2012.
Price target: $4.00
Disclosure: No position, may initiate a position in next 72hours
Reference:
- Zogenix Corporate Presentation
- Bond GR et al. Drug Saf. 2012. Feb 1; 35 (2): 149-57
- Chronic Pain. American Chronic Pain Association. Accessed 12 April 2012.
- Available at: http://theacpa.org/conditionDetail.aspx?id=74
- Institute of Medicine Report from the Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education: Relieving Pain in America, A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education and Research. The National Academies Press, 2011.Accessed 12 April 2012. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13172&page=1
- Farrell, SE. Acetaminophen Toxicity. Medscape. 6 February 2012. Accessed 12 April 2012.
- Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/820200-overview
- Micromedex. Thompson Reuters. 2012
- Reuters, Yahoo Finance
The acetaminophen combo product with codeine is usually labeled with "APAP" to designate the acetaminophen. Dentists give this out routinely. Most patients, myself included, have no idea what this means. For someone already taking Tylenol at the max dose, this is a setup for liver injury.
ReplyDeleteYou are referring to "Tylenol #3" that has both acetaminophen and codeine. In post dental procedures dentist like to prescribe either Tylenol #3 or Vicodin (hydrocodone/acetominophen).
ReplyDeleteAPAP is a common medical abbreviation for acetaminophen. I should've clarified that.